OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE

CENTRAL FOREST SPINE

Placeholder Company Logos
CFS 1

CENTRAL FOREST SPINE (CFS)

OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF THE

CFS Initiatives

A strategic action plan to reconnect, conserve and restore the forest landscapes of Peninsular Malaysia.

Key Challenges Across the CFS.

Key findings from PIRECFS 2022 highlight serious threats to biodiversity and forest ecosystems across Peninsular Malaysia, underscoring the need for urgent action.

21,088

Wildlife deaths from roadkill recorded between 2017 and 2021.

Source:
PIRECFS 2022 Implementation Engagement Session, PLANMalaysia

Fewer Than 150 Malayan Tigers

Fewer than 150 Malayan tigers were recorded in Malaysia in 2021.

Source:
PIRECFS 2022 Implementation Engagement Session, PLANMalaysia

Estimated Losses of RM70.68 Million

Human–wildlife conflict (HWC) complaints involving macaques, wild boars, elephants, common palm civets and pig-tailed macaques were recorded between 2010 and 2021, with estimated losses amounting to RM70.68 million.

Source:
PIRECFS 2022 Implementation Engagement Session, PLANMalaysia

PIRECFS 2022 VISION

Reconnecting the
Forests

PIRECFS 2022 GOAL

Ensure Peninsular Malaysia’s Forest Linkages and the National Biodiversity are Preserved More Effectively and Feasibly

Implementation Direction of the Central Forest Spine (CFS) Master Plan

5

Objectives

Define the overall initiatives of the Master Plan through clear, measurable and high-impact goals.

14

Strategies

Provide structured approaches that align policies, resources and key actions.

38

Actions

Translate each strategy into specific measures for implementation at the operational level.

228

Initiatives

Support implementation through programmes and efforts designed to broaden impact and accelerate the achievement of intended outcomes.

3

Implementation Phases

Establish a structured implementation sequence across defined timeframes to ensure that each component is delivered progressively, systematically and sustainably.

Three Implementation Phases of PIRECFS 2022

PIRECFS 2022 sets out 228 initiatives across three implementation phases from 2022 to 2040. Each phase identifies priority initiatives to be completed according to the priority level of the actions involved.

PHASE 1: 2022-2030

228 Initiatives

Implement the most urgent actions to conserve critical forest areas and reduce threats to wildlife.

228 Initiatives

PHASE 2: 2031 - 2035

177 Inisiatif

Continue the planned initiatives across eight states to strengthen forest and ecological connectivity.

177 Initiatives

PHASE 3: 2036 - 2040

151 Inisiatif

Complete comprehensive ecological restoration based on detailed studies and evaluations of implementation outcomes.

151 Initiatives

5 Key Objectives of PIRECFS 2022

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Strategy 1.1 Integration of the Master Plan in Development Plan

Action 1.1a

Red Action

Detail the Land Use Proposal and Conservation of CFS Areas in the Local Plan (RT).

Action 1.1b

Red Action

Prepare Special Area Plans (RKK) for All CFS Ecological Linkages.

Action 1.2a

Red Action

Detail the Land Use Proposal and Conservation of CFS Areas in the Local Plan (RT).

Action 1.2b

Red Action

Gazette Areas in the Ecological Linkages Experiencing Human-Wildlife Conflict (HWC) as Wildlife Reserves or Sanctuaries.

Action 1.2c

Red Action

Gazette River Reserves and Establish Riparian Zones.

Action 1.2d

Red Action

Develop Sustainable Forest Plantation Projects.

Action 1.2e

Control the Development of New Dams.

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Strategy 2.1 Preservation of Habitat and Biodiversity Resources

Action 2.1a

Red Action

Conduct Comprehensive Biodiversity Resource Monitoring.

Action 2.1b

Red Action

Identify Any Suitable Areas in the Ecological Linkages to be Classified as HCVF / HCVA.

Action 2.2a

Red Action

Reinforce the Habitat Restoration Initiatives.

Action 2.2b

Red Action

Conserve Endemic and Endangered Species within the CFS Ecological Linkages.

Action 2.2c

Red Action

Conserve Aquatic Biodiversity Resources

Action 2.3a

Red Action

Mantain the Well-Being of Wildlife and Local Communities through Coexistence.

Action 2.3b

Red Action

Resolve Human-Wildlife Conflict (HWC) Issues.

Action 2.4a

Red Action

Enhancing the Implementation of Road Safety Audit (RSA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), Green Rating, and Sustainable InfraSTAR for Road and Railway Infrastructure Projects

Action 2.4b

Red Action

Strengthen the Features of Wildlife Crossing Facilities and Traffic-Calming Treatment.

Action 2.4c

Red Action

Improve the Control Systems, Warnings and Awareness

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Strategy 3.1 Development of Sustainable and Biodiversity Friendly Agriculture and Industry

Action 3.1a

Red Action

Develop Agriculture Areas with the Conservation Agriculture Zone (CAZ) Concept.

Action 3.1b

Red Action

Improve the Acquisition of Sustainable Agriculture Certificates in the Agro-Commodity and Agro-Food Sectors

Action 3.1c

Red Action

Increase the Use of Sustainable Certification Products Logos. ​

Action 3.1d

Red Action

Increase the Awareness among Banking and Investment Institutions on Financing Sustainable Agriculture and Primary Industry Activities

Action 3.1e

Red Action

Ensure that Mining and Quarrying Activities in the CFS Areas are Carried out in a Controlled and Sustainable Manner​

Action 3.2a

Red Action

Empower Forest Communities in Developing the Local Economy​

Action 3.2b

Red Action

Preserve Local Intrinsic Values

Action 3.3a

Red Action

Strengthen and Diversifying CFS Tourism Activities as an Alternative Income for the State Economy

Action 3.3b

Red Action

Improve the Level and Quality of Tourism Product Components at Tourist Attractions

Action 3.4a

Red Action

Identify the Potential of Existing Ecosystem Services​

Action 3.4b

Red Action

Enhance the Standard and Quality of Tourism Product Components at Tourist Attractions​

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Strategy 4.1 Strengthening of the Administration Structure and Integration in CFS Management

Action 4.1a

Red Action

Strengthen the Organizational Structure and Role of State Forestry Departments as the Coordinators at State-Level​

Action 4.1b

Red Action

Enhance Coordination and Inclusion of All Stakeholders in CFS Management

Action 4.2a

Red Action

Strengthen the Organizational Structure and Role of State Forestry Departments as the Coordinators at State-Level

Action 4.3a

Red Action

Prepare the Promotion Plan of Central Forest Spine Ecological Linkages Master Plan (PIRECFS) 2022

Action 4.3b

Red Action

Enhance Public Awareness and Participation in Forest Conservation, Restoration and Protection​

Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Strategy 5.1 Strengthening Existing Legal Provisions Relating to the CFS and Ecological Linkages

Action 5.1a

Red Action

Strengthen the Legal Provisions of the National Land Code 1965 (Act 828).

Action 5.1b

Red Action

Strengthen the Legal Provisions of the National Forestry Act 1984 (Act 313).

Action 5.1c

Red Action

Strengthen the Legal Provisions of the Town and Country Planning Act 1976 (Act 172).

Action 5.1d

Red Action

Strengthen the Legal Provisions of Wildlife Conservation Act 2010 (Act 716)

Action 5.1e

Red Action

Strengthen the Legal Provisions under the Aboriginal Peoples Act 1954 (Act 134).

Built for Wildlife

Roads can fragment forest habitats. The CFS addresses this challenge through wildlife viaducts and dedicated crossing structures that allow animals such as Malayan tigers and Asian elephants to move safely across transportation corridors, helping to reduce wildlife–vehicle collisions and conserve biodiversity.

Viaducts Built in Malaysia

A-PL1 Viaduct, Gerik, Perak

Reconnects Temengor Forest Reserve, Amanjaya Forest Reserve and Belum Forest Reserve, which are separated by the Gerik–Jeli Highway. Malaysia’s first wildlife viaduct was constructed along this highway and has since become a reference model for wildlife crossing infrastructure in Southeast Asia.

KEY FEATURES

J-PL1 Viaduct, Kluang, Johor

This viaduct is currently under construction. It will serve as a wildlife crossing connecting the Labis Timur, Mersing and Lenggor Forest Reserves.

KEY FEATURES

Angsi Forest Reserve

Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan

Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve

Lipis, Pahang

A-PL1 Viaduct, Gerik, Perak

Reconnects Temengor Forest Reserve, Amanjaya Forest Reserve and Belum Forest Reserve, which are separated by the Gerik–Jeli Highway. Malaysia’s first wildlife viaduct was constructed along this highway and has since become a reference model for wildlife crossing infrastructure in Southeast Asia.

KEY FEATURES

This viaduct is currently under construction. It will serve as a wildlife crossing connecting the Labis Timur, Mersing and Lenggor Forest Reserves.

KEY FEATURES

For Your Information:

The crossings listed below are located in Peninsular Malaysia but are not managed under the CFS.

Angsi Forest Reserve

Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan

Ulu Jelai Forest Reserve

Lipis, Pahang

Wildlife Facilities

Viaduct Structure

Uses a high-pier design, approximately 13 metres in height, with open space beneath the road to maintain a more natural habitat and facilitate wildlife movement.

Wildlife Diversion Fence

Guides wildlife towards designated crossing points, helping to prevent animals from entering roadways and reducing the risk of wildlife–vehicle collisions.

Box Culvert

Provides a safe passage beneath roads for small and medium-sized wildlife, helping to maintain habitat connectivity and reduce road-related mortality.

Viaduct 4

Elephant Deterrent Trench

The elephant deterrent trench helps prevent elephants from entering roads or settlement areas.

Wildlife Warning Signage

Dedicated warning signs are installed along wildlife crossing areas to alert motorists, encourage lower speeds and help reduce wildlife–vehicle collisions.

Artificial Salt Lick

An artificial salt lick provides minerals that attract wildlife towards safer areas and designated crossing routes, helping to reduce movement towards roads.

Meet the agencies involves in implementing PIRECFS 2022.

Meet the agencies and CFS teams that play an important role in delivering PIRECFS 2022.

Apakah perbezaan Rangkaian Utama dan Sekunder?

Rangkaian Utama

Jalur hutan tanpa putus yang menyambung terus dua kompleks hutan besar, menjadi laluan utama haiwan besar seperti Harimau dan Gajah.

Rangkaian Sekunder

Rangkaian “batu loncatan” hutan kecil yang menyambung kawasan terpisah ke Rangkaian Utama, melintasi ladang dan kawasan penduduk.

What is the difference between Primary Linkage and Secondary Linkage?

Primary Linkage

A continuous forest corridor that directly connects two major forest complexes, providing a primary movement route for large wildlife such as tigers and elephants.

Secondary Linkage

A network of small forest “stepping stones” that connects isolated areas to a Primary Linkage across plantations and settlements.

Maklum balas Berjaya Dihantar

Inisiatif di bawah Tindakan 1.1a

Memperincikan Cadangan Guna Tanah dan Pemeliharaan Kawasan CFS di dalam Rancangan Tempatan (RT).

Hanya inisiatif yang melibatkan JPSM atau JPN sebagai pelaksana utama atau sokongan yang dipaparkan.

BilInisiatifPelaksana UtamaPelaksana SokonganFasa PerlaksanaanTahap Kepentingan Perlaksanaan Red ActionSangat Penting, Memerlukan Tindakan SegeraYellow ActionPenting, Boleh Dijalankan Secara SederhanaGreen ActionPerlu Kajian Terperinci Sebelum Pelaksanaan
1Menggunakan sepenuhnya RT untuk melaksanakan pengurusan tanah hutan dalam negeri secara bersama.​PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBN
II. JPN PBPT
III. PDT / PTD / PTJ
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action
2Sempadan kawasan CFS dan Rangkaian Ekologi perlu dimasukkan ke dalam RT bagi memastikan cadangan yang disediakan di dalam Pelan Induk Rangkaian Ekologi CFS 2022 diwartakan bersekali dengan RT di bawah peruntukan Akta 172. ​PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBPT
II. JPN
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action
3Mengambil kira Kawasan Sensitif Alam Sekitar (KSAS) di dalam kawasan CFS dengan menyediakan analisis dan cadangan di dalam RT bagi memastikan semua KSAS dipelihara dengan baik.PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBPT
II. PDT / PTD / PTJ
III. JPN
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action
4Semua HTK di dalam daerah dicadangkan untuk diwartakan sebagai HSK.​PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBN
II. PDT / PTD / PTJ
III. JPN
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action
5Mengambil kira Kawasan Sensitif Alam Sekitar (KSAS) di dalam kawasan CFS dengan menyediakan analisis dan cadangan di dalam RT bagi memastikan semua KSAS dipelihara dengan baik.​PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBN
II. PBPT
III. PDT / PTD / PTJ
IV. JPN
V. JAS
VI. JMG
VII. JPS
VIII. Jabatan Pertanian
IX. Jabatan PERHILITAN
X. JWN
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action
6Menyediakan zon penampan di sekitar Rangkaian Ekologi bagi memastikan aktiviti guna tanah di kawasan sekitar selaras dan menyokong peranan Rangkaian Ekologi bagi menghubungkan hutan yang terpisah. ​PLANMalaysia @NegeriI. PBN
II. PTG
III. JPN
IV. JPS
V. Jabatan PERHILITAN
VI. PBPT
VII. PDT / PTD / PTJ
Fasa 1

Fasa 2
Red Action